The Johnson Partnership Solicitors have now released the DVD recording of my interview with CID detectives hiding behind code numbers on 3 May 2014 at Bridewell Police Station.
The tape is damning and proves the police lied on behalf of the two complainants and when challenged to name ‘phantom witnesses’, they could not name anyone. Likewise, when challenged to name the police colleagues of the complainant who were ‘shocked’ by what they read, CID could not name a single person because it’s all fabrication. Of course it comes as no surprise that CID officers have lied, it’s what they do for a living.
The female CID officer admits that she has not met the neo-Nazi complainant but nonetheless insists said person is not a neo-Nazi. But the complainant has now admitted this fact, crushed under the weight of evidence, proving CID lied on her behalf and did so knowingly and it’s all on the tape.
Both CID officers refused to answer any questions regarding evidence, particularly in relation to the ‘phantom witnesses’ fabricated by the police complainant. It is to be hoped CID behave like this in court under cross-examination because they will be torn to shreds in short order. Refusing to answer questions under cross-examination in court is guaranteed defeat.
Below is a summary my solicitor asked me to prepare of the main points of the interview.
11:30 to 12:25 minutes: CID officers do not deny my bail address was leaked by corrupt officers at Eastwood Police Station and say “this is something we will have to look at”.
13:20 to 14:55 minutes: CID admit they have not met the neo-Nazi complainant and do not know her but lie on her behalf nonetheless.
15:20 to 16:25 minutes: CID officers discover Simon Tomlin was given the home addresses of both complainants by police informant Neil Jackson, who was later exposed in illegal entrapment operation with corrupt officers at Eastwood Police Station.
21:30 to 22:00 minutes: CID officers did not deny when challenged that Blood & Honour leader Alastair Bullman is a Covert Human Intelligence Source for Special Branch is directly involved with the neo-Nazi complainant.
25:55 to 39:10 minutes: The neo-Nazi complainant is discussed in detail and CID don’t deny she is a police informant and has supplied them with information. Her involvement with Blood & Honour UK and the British Movement is covered at length and the CID officers are unable to refute any point. CID officers accuse Simon of making “death threats” against the neo-Nazi complainant and then 5 minutes later admit “they are not overt threats” and that in fact Simon did not threaten the complainant. Simon was not charged with making death threats.
39:30 to 1:07:48 minutes: The police complainant is discussed in great detail and CID officers cannot name a single person the complainant claims approached him in the street and accused him of being corrupt because the allegation is completely fabricated. Likewise, CID cannot name any of the officers who claimed they were ‘shocked’ to read about the complainant’s alleged antics in harassing and intimidating witnesses, particularly Joyce Wharton and Janet Envers. It should be noted that Joyce Wharton and Envers subsequently changed their story and the evidence proves it beyond reasonable doubt. The police complainant threatened Simon with revenge and on 4 June this year, Simon was attacked by Shaun Bonner, who was an informant for the police complainant. CID officers did not deny when challenged that Shaun Bonner is a police informant. Bonner has now been charged with assault and the CPS have put a restraining order on him until his trial is concluded because Bonner made threats to kill during the assault.
During the rest of the interview, the desperate CID officers accused Simon of being in league with gangster Colin Gunn – convicted of conspiracy to murder Joan and John Stirland, for which he was given a 35 year sentence – despite the fact Simon does not know Colin or David Gunn and has never met them. When challenged to produce evidence, CID had no evidence of any description and fabricated the allegation. At the close of the interview, CID officers go off on a dream-world tangent, accusing Simon of involvement in ‘inciting’ the August 2011 riots, despite the fact he was in Derbyshire at the time and even called for the Army to be mobilised in defence of the civil power.
It is a shocking exercise in character assassination and evil fantasy and when challenged to produce evidence to support their warped allegations and lies, CID officers could not produce evidence.
More importantly, Detective 0700617 admits several times in the interview that the published material is “open to interpretation” and that the ‘harassment’ allegation is merely a matter of opinion not fact and there is no supporting evidence.
Based on this taped interview, the West Midlands Chief Prosecutor rejected all four Section 4 Harassment allegations against Simon because they were fabricated. A serving police Inspector and a former Chief Supt cannot be named at this point for legal reasons but when said conditions are lifted, they will be named and the entire tape recording will be released in the public domain.
The police cannot be allowed to fabricate malicious allegations without supporting evidence, use and abuse the legal system to bring a malicious prosecution and then get away with it.
The CID officers in question Detective 0700617 and Detective 2003058 both want to claim ‘witness anonymity’ behind which to reiterate their appalling lies. If the court grants a witness anonymity order, it will be challenged under Judicial Review at the Court of Appeal immediately before any trial can take place.
The tape recorded interview proves beyond question that the police and neo-Nazis are in collusion to bring a malicious prosecution and they must be stopped in the public interest before they destroy ‘open justice’ for everyone in Britain.